Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
skills422 | 3-2 | None |
Azorius Auras , Azorius Enchantments , Bant Auras , Bant Gearhulk , Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Esper Pixie , Naya Auras , Orzhov Enchantments
Ethereal Armor ranks #90 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 22%).
White average: 74.9%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Ethereal Armor is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Performance Efficiency: 60.00 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Ethereal Armor has a win rate of 60.0%, making it 19.1% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mabel, Heir to Cragflame | Legendary Creature — Mouse Soldier | 5 | 84.8% | 3 |
Lightning Helix | Instant | 27 | 68.5% | 10 |
Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 9 | 67.5% | 7 |
Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 5 | 64.8% | 2 |
Break the Spell | Instant | 6 | 59.5% | 3 |
Flowerfoot Swordmaster | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 8 | 56.1% | 3 |
Requisition Raid | Sorcery | 9 | 51.5% | 3 |
Torch the Tower | Instant | 38 | 48.4% | 10 |
Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 8 | 47.8% | 3 |
Spellbook Vendor | Creature — Human Peasant | 24 | 44.2% | 4 |
Cards that perform better with Ethereal Armor than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Auras | 61 | 95.3% | 36.9% |
Boros Auras | 37 | 56.1% | 42.2% |
Boros Burn | 18 | 4.6% | 47.4% |
Selesnya Auras | 10 | 90.9% | 35.5% |
Esper Pixie | 8 | 0.5% | 30.6% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.